It wasn't just the title that got me to immediately pick up Ghosts of the Missing, or the author, whose novel ASHES OF FIERY WEATHER was one of my faves, but the story itself haunted me: a twelve-year-old girl mysteriously vanishes from her town, impacting lives and unburying secrets.
I always think something is haunting a writer into
writing the books that they do, so I was wondering what was haunting you to
write Ghosts of the Missing?
In 1979 six-year-old Etan Patz disappeared off a Manhattan
street while walking to the school bus alone for the first time. He was two
weeks older than me, and I’m from Brooklyn, NY. I knew what a city sidewalk looked like at
eight o’clock in the morning. Even to a child, it was clear that whatever
happened to Etan began quietly. He was seen by a mailman waiting to cross Wooster
Street, in sight of the bus stop. Then never again. After thirty-eight years, a
man was convicted of his murder, but Etan has never been found.
I’ve since read about hundreds of missing persons cases (The
internet has made it easy.) Haunting, certainly, are thoughts of the families, suspended
between grief and hope. There are the disappearances themselves, those with circumstances
that defy logic, coupled with the awareness that they do not, in fact, defy logic.
Every one, no matter how inexplicable, has an answer. Nobody actually vanishes
into thin air.
But I think what haunted me into writing this book are what
I call the last knowns. By this I mean the last definitive sighting. Or the
last probable sighting, when it’s uncertain. Ghosts of the Missing is very much
about this--the final moment when everything was okay.
Dorothy Arnold in December, 1910 chatting with a friend outside
Brentano’s bookstore on Fifth Avenue in New York City. Beverly Potts of Cleveland,
OH in 1951, walking home alone on an August evening, five minutes from a park to
her house. Morgan Nick of Arkansas, in 1995, four years old, emptying sand from
her shoe. Madeleine McCann, in Portugal, 2007, asleep in bed.
There’s so much in this extraordinary novel about the
whole notion of how time changes things: how we feel about a missing person,
how medicine treats illness, and truly, how love deepens. Can you talk about this
please?
Think of the expression, or maybe
it’s a cliché, “it was a different time and place.” ‘Place’ can be literal, of
course, but often it just means that the world was different then. We reference the past as if it exists outside
of our memories and that it’s possible to visit, if only we could find the way.
Often, we talk about time as if what’s changed things is time itself, as though
it’s a tangible force.
In Ghosts of the Missing, the
protagonist, Adair, is born when AIDS is always fatal, but by the time she’s an
adult, it’s become a treatable illness for those who have access to the
medication. Then there’s Rowan, who vanished at the age of twelve, and for whom
time has stopped. So in the novel there is a juxtaposition between tidal change
and perpetual limbo.
Blood diseases (both AIDS and Hemophilia) factor into the
novel as a kind of metaphor, something passed down, much like the tragedy in
this novel. Do you think that the way we treat genetic illness is much the same
as the way we treat the terrible legacies that are handed down to us?
Yes, in that it becomes a question of a life being shaped,
or at least greatly impacted, from the outset by circumstances that could not
be predicted (The books is set in the days before prenatal genetic testing). All
of us have legacies that we have to grapple with. For most, they’re not
physically manifested. In Ghosts, it is. Adair inherits the legacy of hemophilia
in her family, a serious illness which becomes catastrophic in the 1980’s
because of AIDS.
I loved the whole idea of the writer’s retreat in the novel,
a place to get away, which brings us to the whole idea of stories. How do you
think that stories can save us or shape our lives?
Writers’ retreats exist purely to
facilitate the creation of stories. This tells us how vital they are to our
lives. To read is to step into the imagination of someone we’ve never met.
There are stories in which we see ourselves and stories that bring us into
lives we’ve never personally experienced. In that way, they can show us
something we never would have seen otherwise. But, that said, I think a story
isn’t required to instruct or enlighten. They only have to walk us into
eloquence. Eloquence is snow, general, all over Ireland in The Dead. It’s the fists
curling around rocks in Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery. It is the heart thumping
against the floorboards in The Tell-Tale Heart and pulling the heart out of the
turkey in Alice Munro’s Turkey Season.
What’s obsessing you
now and why?
What’s obsessing me now is genealogical DNA, both as a tool
to solve cold crimes and its home-use to identify relatives. As difficult as it
must be to discover that the person you thought was your biological parent is not,
or that you have a sibling you never knew about, I keep thinking about the
secret-keepers. A man never told his family
that he was a sperm donor twenty-five years ago and now he’s being contacted by
the thirty children he fathered. The woman who knows one of her children isn’t
her husband’s. The murderer who never got caught. The fertility doctor who fathered
his patients’ children in place of the woman’s husband or a chosen donor. Then
one day, anybody can buy a DNA kit in Rite Aide and now people are being found,
and found out, because a third cousin once removed did 23andme.
What question didn’t I ask that I should have?
How did you think of the title?
-->
The average reader might scoot by this, but like I said, it's nuanced--it's beauty and art, and this subtlety, found in a single line, permeates the book. Without giving away the details, it is connecting past, present, history, emotion internal and visually--we are ourselves living our lives like the clock!
ReplyDeleteIt's brilliant, really. Phenomenal story. Looking forward to her next book.
KRW Hail Claims Lawyers