Valerie Trueblood is one of the masters of short story writing. Her new collection Search Party is unsettling, full of desperation, and yet brimming with a kind of hope as well. A young babysitter takes care of a child who falls dangerously ill, a cop tackles a violent student, and a homeless family reexamines the meaning of home, and all of the people struggle to find meaning and a mastery of their situation. It's just a gorgeous collection. She's a contributing editor to The American Poetry Review, and her essays, articles, and poetry have appeared in One Story, The Northwest Review, The Iowa Review, The Seattle Times, and Seattle Weekly, among others. She lives in Seattle and I am totally thrilled to host her here. Thank you so much, Valerie!
Why does the very idea of a search lead to so much story?
We need so many things! A lot of life is spent in finding them. While we may not go out with a lantern like Diogenes, we do spend a lot of time searching, from babyhood on: for food, safety, a friend, work, knowledge, a place to live, a mate--and finally searching our own memories for what remains of these things when we're old. I admit this came to me just now in thinking about your question. I didn't think in these sweeping terms when I was writing the stories. A story can't be summoned that way. Mine seem to have to be found under a rock.
I also want to ask you about the title, which I think is perfect--Search Party, seems so ominous, but then there is the subhead, stories of rescue, which almost makes us breathe a sigh of relief.
You're a writer, and you're the reader we all want: someone who feels the ominousness, someone who sighs with relief--and just at the title, at that. I wish everyone read in this spirit, with this openness to what might be coming.
We need so many things! A lot of life is spent in finding them. While we may not go out with a lantern like Diogenes, we do spend a lot of time searching, from babyhood on: for food, safety, a friend, work, knowledge, a place to live, a mate--and finally searching our own memories for what remains of these things when we're old. I admit this came to me just now in thinking about your question. I didn't think in these sweeping terms when I was writing the stories. A story can't be summoned that way. Mine seem to have to be found under a rock.
I also want to ask you about the title, which I think is perfect--Search Party, seems so ominous, but then there is the subhead, stories of rescue, which almost makes us breathe a sigh of relief.
You're a writer, and you're the reader we all want: someone who feels the ominousness, someone who sighs with relief--and just at the title, at that. I wish everyone read in this spirit, with this openness to what might be coming.
I do believe in rescue. The
situation gets pretty desperate and now and then--perhaps rarely, but
often enough that we remember the times it happened or the stories we
heard of it--someone says or does something that helps, even saves. How
or why this happens at times, and at others does not, is one of the
mysteries, and the short story seems to me the perfect vessel for it.
Because the story isn't obliged to say why. It just holds the mystery.
How do you go about crafting a story? Your language is so exquisite that I’d love it if you could talk about the relationship between story and language.
It takes me a long time to get a sort of tent up and then I see it's empty, and that must be when I try to somehow create rooms in it. But that's an easy metaphor, isn't it. For me the story really has less to do with construction than with sound. I hear a story faintly and in fragments and have to listen for it and try to lure it, so I can get some of the pieces down on paper. Then for a long time it's just adding in the tones of someone's experience, and then heavy subtracting.
How do you go about crafting a story? Your language is so exquisite that I’d love it if you could talk about the relationship between story and language.
It takes me a long time to get a sort of tent up and then I see it's empty, and that must be when I try to somehow create rooms in it. But that's an easy metaphor, isn't it. For me the story really has less to do with construction than with sound. I hear a story faintly and in fragments and have to listen for it and try to lure it, so I can get some of the pieces down on paper. Then for a long time it's just adding in the tones of someone's experience, and then heavy subtracting.
Each
story seems to have its own language, depending on the person having
the experience or living through the state of mind. So the words for
what happens to a poet have to be filtered through the poet's senses and
thought, and they'll have a tone, a pattern different from that of the
words for what happens to a policeman. Before anybody assaults me, let
me say that I know at least two poet-policemen! I'm just using these
broad categories because a couple of characters in this book fit them
and their stories have their own sound (while I hope still having
something an Artificial Intelligence, if it read them, would know came
from the same "voice").
I don't think writers
can investigate our own style very deeply--or even think about it at
great length--without getting into trouble, though.
Your endings are so deeply satisfying and unexpected. Do they take you by surprise or do you know them before you begin?
Your endings are so deeply satisfying and unexpected. Do they take you by surprise or do you know them before you begin?
What’s obsessing you now and why?
Another book is taking shape,
stories of love. People grin if they hear that. But however jaded we
get about what has been "done" in fiction, however eager for new
categories, love is never done with. Though I like to have war in there
too--war being a form of hate--weighing on people who live in a rather
heartless time while trying to fulfill the human duties. Thus the title
of the second group, Let Live.
What question didn’t I ask that I should have?
What question didn’t I ask that I should have?
You ask wonderful questions, that tempt us to go on and on about ourselves. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment